The instinct in earned media is to pursue the largest available name. Securing coverage in a widely recognized publication feels like the definitive win, and it is the outcome most clients ask for by name. For a substantial share of businesses, it is the wrong target.
Royston G King argues that topical proximity outperforms raw audience size for most commercial objectives. Having built a personal following of more than 12 million and liaised with dozens of major publications through Master Scaling since 2018, the Forbes 30 Under 30 Monaco honouree, a University of Southern California alumnus since accepted into Columbia University, is not dismissive of scale. His point is that scale and relevance are different assets, and organizations routinely buy the wrong one.
The reasoning runs through several mechanisms.
Retrieval systems weight topical context. When an AI assistant assembles an answer about a specialized category, it draws on sources whose surrounding content establishes relevance to that category. A publication covering an industry in depth provides that context. A general-interest outlet covering everything provides less of it, even at far greater scale. A modest trade title can outperform a major masthead for a specialized query for exactly this reason.
Readership composition matters more than readership size. A trade publication read by ten thousand people who all work in the relevant industry delivers more qualified attention than a general outlet read by two million people, of whom a few hundred are prospective buyers. The conversion difference is frequently large enough to reverse the apparent ranking entirely.
Trade coverage is more achievable and more repeatable. Major outlets receive enormous pitch volume and cover a narrow band of stories. Trade publications actively need industry expertise and are considerably more receptive to substantive contributed material. That accessibility permits cadence, which matters more than any single placement.
Trade coverage compounds within a category. Repeated presence in the publications an industry actually reads builds the association between a company name and its category. That association is what determines whether an organization appears in the consideration set when someone asks an assistant for options.
King’s qualification is that major outlets retain genuine value for specific purposes. Recognition from a widely known publication carries signaling weight in fundraising conversations, executive recruitment, and partnership discussions, where the audience
is not evaluating industry expertise but assessing legitimacy quickly. Where those objectives are live, the pursuit is justified.
The error is treating one as a substitute for the other. Quantum Scaling Partners sequences client media work by starting with the publications a category actually reads, establishing consistent presence there, and pursuing broader recognition once there is a documented body of work to point to. Attempting the reverse order tends to produce a single placement with nothing behind it.
Cost is the other consideration. Placements at major outlets, where they are available on a commercial basis at all, carry pricing that reflects the name rather than the qualified attention delivered. Trade coverage is frequently earned rather than purchased, because the publications genuinely need industry expertise and will accept substantive contributed material from practitioners who have something specific to say.
There is a practical test King offers. Ask where a prospective buyer in the category actually reads about the industry. For most business-to-business categories, the honest answer is a small number of trade titles, a handful of newsletters, several podcasts, and one or two community forums. That list is the target. It rarely includes the publication the client named at the start of the conversation.
The distinction matters most for budget. Pursuing a single major placement can absorb an entire quarter’s media effort. The same effort distributed across the publications a category actually reads generally produces more citations, more qualified inquiries, and a more durable position.
Connect With Royston G. King
To learn more about Royston G. King and follow his latest work, visit his official website, connect with him on Instagram and LinkedIn, or watch his latest content on YouTube.
